I4-YT-0006YouTube commentary / source analysis
2:26 AM Call Between JD and Kaylee — Commentary & Source Check
Source / collection Accomplished_Day
Source context & limitations
From I4-YT-0006. These are the existing catalog’s descriptions and labels; they do not establish participation, location, or the truth of an account.
Date as cataloged
20 Aug 2026 (indexed; verify)
No unambiguous recording day is established for filtering. The original wording remains above.
Interviewee attribution
No explicit interviewee attribution indexed.
This field uses the archive’s explicit interview attribution, separately from general people labels.
People / source labels
- Accomplished_Day / Accomplished-Day1614
- Jack DuCoeur (JD)
- Kaylee Goncalves
- Madison ‘Maddie’ Mogen
- Det. Sgt. Mike Van Leuven
- Det. Rich Alderson
- Kaylee Goncalves’s sister and family (referenced in creator commentary)
Locations / source labels
- Idaho State Police District 1 office
- Moscow, Idaho
- 1122 King Road (case context)
- DuCoeur’s residence (location redacted / not established)
Existing catalog summary
A short Accomplished_Day commentary video arguing that the November 17, 2022 Idaho State Police interview of Jack DuCoeur confirms an answered telephone call between Kaylee Goncalves and DuCoeur at 2:26 a.m. on November 13. The video’s publicly indexed description says the call lasted 16.88 minutes and that investigators had DuCoeur’s phone information during the interview. The underlying interview preserved in Record 004 substantially supports the narrower factual core: at 16:54 an investigator says printouts had been sent ‘from your phone’; at 19:07 he calls the entries incoming to DuCoeur’s phone; at 19:11 he identifies an entry dated November 13 at 2:26 a.m.; and at 19:20–19:26 he describes it as a 16.88-minute answered call. DuCoeur says he does not remember the call, later recalls seeing the entry on his phone, and accepts an accidental-answer explanation only as his best guess. The interview also says no call audio was known to be available. The source therefore supports that investigators were reviewing a printout showing an answered connection, but it does not establish what was said, whether anyone spoke, why the connection remained open, the precise technical origin or completeness of the printout, or the physical locations of either phone. Claims that the clip conclusively proves a 17-minute conversation, establishes motive, or resolves broader timeline disputes go beyond the underlying source. A complete transcript of this commentary video was not available during cataloging; Record 006 must be updated in place if captions or a supplied transcript become available.
Existing record notes
- This is a secondary commentary record, not an additional law-enforcement interview. Record 004 is the primary archive source for the quoted interview passage.
- A complete transcript of the YouTube commentary video was not retrievable. Do not create a new record when it becomes available; update Record 006 in place.
- The video title and description frame the call as confirmed. The underlying interview confirms a displayed answered-call entry, not the contents of a 17-minute conversation.
- The phrase ‘16.88 minutes’ is preserved as spoken. The native call record is needed to determine its exact formatting, decimal conversion, and underlying duration field.
- The investigator says the records are incoming to DuCoeur’s phone and associates the entry with Kaylee; this supports call direction as presented in the interview but should still be checked against the native phone exhibit.
- ‘Printouts from your phone’ does not by itself prove investigators possessed a complete forensic extraction or every category of phone data on November 17.
- The indexed upload date and secondary duration listing require confirmation from the YouTube page or creator’s original file.
- Commentary statements disputing other researchers or publications are advocacy and interpretation, not independent evidence.