Three-page redacted ISP Supplemental Report 0115, titled “IV – TIP 6008,” by Detective Matthew Heinle. The report describes December 5, 2022 follow-up by Heinle and Detective William Adams concerning an online photograph and a reported knife. It records interviewees’ accounts, a consented buccal swab, and photographs of knives. These are recorded investigative steps and witness statements; the report does not establish a connection between the photographed knives and the homicides.
A two-page Moscow Police Department chain-of-custody report for case 22-M09903 and evidence 22M-1810, described as Item 11, a tan K-BAR sheath with a USMC logo found on a bed in a third-story bedroom. The log shows booking and receipt by Brett Payne on November 14–15, 2022; two duplicated-looking temporary-release entries to ISP Willerford for transport to the ISP lab on November 16; two duplicated-looking lab-return entries on December 16; legal-defense review by Jeff Talbott on April 6, 2023; defense review associated with Brent Turvey on December 12, 2024; repackaging by Brett Payne on June 23, 2025; and a July 7, 2025 location-change/hold entry. Custodian identities are heavily redacted. The report documents recorded custody transactions but does not itself contain DNA results, packaging photographs, seals, or signatures.
A Moscow Police Department custody report for incident 22-M09903 and evidence number 22M-1839, described as “Item 40 Blood Swab” from the “F3 South closet wall.” It records booking at 9:34:47 a.m. on November 14, 2022 and receipt/booking at 4:59:25 p.m. on November 15, both associated with Brett Payne and the reason “Send to Lab.” It records legal-defense viewing by Jeff Talbott on April 7, 2023 for photography. The report does not state the swab’s biological profile, test result, source individual, collection method, packaging condition, lab accession number, or whether “blood” was analytically confirmed.
A Moscow Police Department evidence log for incident 22-M09903 and item number 22M-2144, described as Item 290: an envelope, letter, and playing cards submitted by ISP Detective Matt Heinle under ISP Supplemental 72 for “possible suspect DNA.” The item was booked on December 6, 2022; opened for legal-defense review on April 6, 2023; copied for the Latah County Prosecutor on April 17, 2023; and moved to another evidence location on July 8, 2025. The log documents the stated testing purpose but includes no sender/recipient identity, letter text, card description, DNA test result, comparison, or conclusion that suspect DNA was present.
Custody report 23M-0164 for Item 490, a DVD containing an interview documented in ISP Supplemental 64 by ISP Detective Cody Herman. The DVD was received and copied for the Latah County Prosecutor on January 13, 2023 and viewed by legal defense on March 31. The interview subject and contents are not identified in this report.
Custody report 23M-1085 for Item 739, a DVD of a redacted subject's interview under ISP Supplemental 002, attributed to ISP Detective Sergeant Hoxie and Lieutenant Catlin. It was booked June 27, 2023 and viewed by legal defense September 28. The report does not include the interview or identify the subject.
Custody report 23M-1106 for Item 753, a thumb drive containing a redacted interview labeled ISP Supplemental 017 and dated only “11/22.” The comments attribute the interview to Detective James Millar and Detective Sergeant Ken Beckner. It was booked/copied June 29, 2023 and viewed by legal defense September 28.
A later three-page export for the same MPD evidence number 22M-1810 / Item 11 K-BAR knife sheath documented in Record 017. It lists custody events from November 2022 through July 2025, including laboratory-related transfers and later review/location changes. This is a separate report export, not a second sheath or newly collected evidence item.
Screenshots of text messages concerning scene security, a search warrant, evidence-photo storage under CJIS policy, documentation of window-lock positions, laboratory processing, cleanup of stained drywall, and obtaining elimination fingerprints from the two surviving roommates. The export contains gaps and does not establish the complete conversation chronology.
An email thread discussing terminology and observations concerning the knife sheath, including the relationship between its leather strap and metal snap. The exchange is useful for interpreting related sheath photographs but should be read with the native lab notes and evidence log.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2022, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2025, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.
One component of Kootenai County incident 24-27558, a June 19, 2024 domestic-dispute response involving Alivea Goncalves. The records document a 911 report, dispatch activity, interviews, observations, and agency disposition; they are background public records and are not evidence of the November 2022 homicides.
A 2,356-page Idaho State Police Forensic Services production centered on laboratory case M2022-4843 for Moscow Police case 22-M09903, with related ISP Investigations laboratory case M2022-4870 / D22000030 material. The release contains case jackets, submission and item inventories, chain-of-custody and location records, biology and DNA worksheets, STRmix output, CODIS-related documentation, latent-print processing and comparison reports, analyst notes, technical and administrative reviews, correspondence, discovery-packet histories, audit entries, and supporting forms. It records numerous submissions from November 2022 through June 2025 and references suspected biological stains, reference samples, DNA extracts, latent lifts, clothing and other evidence. Individual report language and statistical conclusions must be read in context; this archive record indexes the production and its searchable extraction rather than collapsing thousands of pages into a single forensic conclusion.
A large collection of Idaho State Police investigative supplements for case D22000030. The searchable extraction includes the November 13, 2022 initial call-out, witness and roommate interviews, crime-scene work on multiple dates, photographic and SUAS documentation, evidence transport, phone and video inquiries, search-warrant activity, receipts, hospital checks, WSU and Moscow reports, vehicle and Hyundai Elantra processing, defense evidence processing, and later witness-list follow-up. At least 117 unique supplement identifiers and 35 report-title labels are visible in the extraction, with reports attributed to numerous ISP investigators. The collection records officer narratives, witness recollections, investigative leads and later follow-up; those categories are not interchangeable with independently proven fact.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “Screenshot 2025-08-12 7.58.10 PM.png,” filed under Pullman Documents › Emails › Police & Other Official Emails. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of Pullman, Washington agency records, correspondence, spreadsheets, and related source documents. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9499.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9500.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9501.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9502.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9503.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9504.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9505.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_9506.PNG,” filed under Court Docs › Bethany Funke Subpoena . The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.