Body-camera footage attributed to Officer Gunderson during the Queen Road canvass, roughly 11:26–11:41 a.m. Officers inspect a residence where a television had been moved and a game system was reportedly gone, speak with two residents, run registration checks, and make a localized observation near the rear of a second floor. The footage documents canvass activity; online claims that a mark is blood or an object is a bracelet are not established by the recording.
A short Accomplished_Day commentary video arguing that the November 17, 2022 Idaho State Police interview of Jack DuCoeur confirms an answered telephone call between Kaylee Goncalves and DuCoeur at 2:26 a.m. on November 13. The video’s publicly indexed description says the call lasted 16.88 minutes and that investigators had DuCoeur’s phone information during the interview. The underlying interview preserved in Record 004 substantially supports the narrower factual core: at 16:54 an investigator says printouts had been sent ‘from your phone’; at 19:07 he calls the entries incoming to DuCoeur’s phone; at 19:11 he identifies an entry dated November 13 at 2:26 a.m.; and at 19:20–19:26 he describes it as a 16.88-minute answered call. DuCoeur says he does not remember the call, later recalls seeing the entry on his phone, and accepts an accidental-answer explanation only as his best guess. The interview also says no call audio was known to be available. The source therefore supports that investigators were reviewing a printout showing an answered connection, but it does not establish what was said, whether anyone spoke, why the connection remained open, the precise technical origin or completeness of the printout, or the physical locations of either phone. Claims that the clip conclusively proves a 17-minute conversation, establishes motive, or resolves broader timeline disputes go beyond the underlying source. A complete transcript of this commentary video was not available during cataloging; Record 006 must be updated in place if captions or a supplied transcript become available.
A three-page Ada County Sheriff computer-aided dispatch incident detail report for incident 25-0245748 and case ACS25-006518. The CAD entry says a Goncalves family attorney emailed Deputy James C. Revello concerning a threatening text sent to Kristi Goncalves after the Kohberger sentencing. According to the report narrative, the text was received on July 23, 2025 at 10:42 a.m. and claimed that the sender was in contact with a ‘wannabe serial killer’ in Moscow, Idaho and had provided that person with Kristi’s address. The originating phone number and part of the attorney identification are visibly redacted. The report says carrierlookup.com identified the number as a VoIP number through SINCH and that a second, redacted database search returned negative results. Revello created a low-priority THREAT-Threat Report at the Ada County Courthouse at 1:38:07 p.m. on July 24, obtained case number ACS25-006518 ten seconds later, and closed the response at 2:05:40 p.m. with the disposition ‘RPT-Report Taken.’ The CAD contains no attached copy of the text message, no sender identification, no underlying carrier record, and no documented independent confirmation that the sender actually knew another person or possessed Kristi Goncalves’s address. The archive preserves the original PDF, a checked editorial transcription, the visible redactions, and the distinction between what the CAD records and what remains unverified.
A résumé or curriculum-vitae document attributed to Brent Turvey. It is indexed as a background source for credentials and chronology; employment, education, and qualification claims require verification with the issuing institutions.
The eighth and largest text installment compiles media requests, interview invitations, press releases, campus-safety communications, public-records correspondence, parking/LPR references, warrant-related material, and institutional messaging. Examples include a December 27, 2022 podcast invitation to WSU Police leadership, January 3 Moscow releases on extradition and nondissemination, and WSU communications describing increased patrols, safe-ride and escort resources, academic flexibility, and employee/student support after the homicides and arrest. Repetition and forwarded chains are substantial; each item’s sender, date, attachment, and status should be verified in the original.
A BronxTails True Crime community post shares an image of a response to a request for ISP Lab Report 42. The displayed correspondence says there are no responsive records and that the laboratory did not generate or issue a report numbered 42. The creator expresses skepticism. This entry preserves the source and distinguishes the displayed response from the creator’s interpretation; it does not establish concealment or the existence of an undisclosed report.
A BronxTails True Crime community post describes a law-enforcement Amazon purchase as a recreation of an order attributed to Bryan Kohberger. The creator questions the seller, sheath markings, supplement choices, and purpose of the purchase. The visible attachment shows a red carrying case. These descriptions and questions are attributed to the creator; this post alone does not establish the original order details, the origin of any markings, or misconduct.
A BronxTails True Crime community post discusses a records return identified as MPD Report 170 and a separate request concerning Report 202. The creator contrasts the release of material about kitchen knives with a reported delay for another knife-related request. The displayed attachment is a redacted supplemental narrative labeled sequence 170 concerning knives near Genesee. The post’s comparisons and interpretations are commentary, not findings about the knives or the reasons for the response times.
A Christy’s Chaos commentary video titled “IDAHO- WHITES, BLOOD, NOT DYLAN.” The uploader says the video addresses a circulated photograph and argues that the person shown is not Dylan. The title also references “Whites” and blood, but the public description does not identify the photograph, establish the people depicted, or provide an official evidentiary source for those labels. This archive entry preserves the creator’s video and attribution without adopting the identification or blood-related interpretation as fact.