A three-page Ada County Sheriff computer-aided dispatch incident detail report for incident 25-0245748 and case ACS25-006518. The CAD entry says a Goncalves family attorney emailed Deputy James C. Revello concerning a threatening text sent to Kristi Goncalves after the Kohberger sentencing. According to the report narrative, the text was received on July 23, 2025 at 10:42 a.m. and claimed that the sender was in contact with a ‘wannabe serial killer’ in Moscow, Idaho and had provided that person with Kristi’s address. The originating phone number and part of the attorney identification are visibly redacted. The report says carrierlookup.com identified the number as a VoIP number through SINCH and that a second, redacted database search returned negative results. Revello created a low-priority THREAT-Threat Report at the Ada County Courthouse at 1:38:07 p.m. on July 24, obtained case number ACS25-006518 ten seconds later, and closed the response at 2:05:40 p.m. with the disposition ‘RPT-Report Taken.’ The CAD contains no attached copy of the text message, no sender identification, no underlying carrier record, and no documented independent confirmation that the sender actually knew another person or possessed Kristi Goncalves’s address. The archive preserves the original PDF, a checked editorial transcription, the visible redactions, and the distinction between what the CAD records and what remains unverified.
A 13-page Ada County Sheriff report, DR 2025-6518, documenting a threatening-text complaint made by Kristi Goncalves during Bryan Kohberger's July 23, 2025 sentencing. Deputy James Revello records that an unknown sender claimed to be near Goncalves in court, asserted Kohberger's innocence, referenced serial killers, and claimed to have supplied her address to a person in Moscow. The report traces investigative steps through carrier lookup, a TextMe preservation request and warrant, a Google warrant, account/device/billing observations, and IP-location analysis. It ultimately identifies Southeast England—particularly Kent—as the likely persistent service area and closes the case as “Other Jurisdiction.” Names, telephone numbers, emails, account IDs, IP addresses, and payment details are redacted. The sender's statements and the report's identity/location conclusions remain allegations and investigative inferences, not adjudicated facts.
An eight-page handwritten petition in civil case CV01-26-15094 seeking withdrawal of Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea. It references criminal case CR01-24-31665, a July 23, 2025 sentence, four capital-murder counts and felony burglary, and life without parole plus ten years. The petition alleges ineffective assistance, an unknowing or involuntary plea, unkept promises, threats by counsel, failure to disclose or review claimed exculpatory material, and misrepresentations concerning death row and prison conditions. A supporting affidavit expands those allegations. Kohberger requests in-forma-pauperis status and appointed counsel. These are a petitioner's disputed allegations; the PDF contains no response, evidentiary ruling, or decision. Page 8 is a scanned legal-mail envelope.
A three-sheet workbook identifying an Amazon account as Bryan C Kohberger and presenting subscription information, 289 click-activity rows, and 57 sign-in-history rows. Click activity clusters on March 20–26, November 15 and 22, and December 6, 2022, including KA-BAR knife, sheath and sharpener product pages plus account/order and deletion-flow pages. Click paths document account/session activity, not who used a device, completed purchases, delivery, possession, or physical location.
This source photograph shows a used disposable cup, lid, or straw shown from a different angle beside a measurement scale. It is preserved as a discrete image because its angle, examiner marks, and evidence-card information may differ from adjacent photographs in the same series. The image documents visible condition only; item identity, collection location, date, ownership, and custody must be verified through the corresponding photo log and evidence report.
A police incident record titled “Jack Showalter Fighting Arrest Police Report.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “012224-Temporary-Order-Sealing-States-Memorandum.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2024. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
The seventh installment is warrant-focused. It includes Whitman County templates and completed application language for searching Kohberger’s Steptoe Village apartment and WSU office, descriptions of the premises, probable-cause material supplied by Idaho investigators, categories of property sought, supporting declarations, and related warrant/inventory records. Because the extraction can flatten checkboxes, signature blocks, exhibits, and inventories, the signed original pages—not this text layer—control the scope actually authorized and the items recorded as seized.
This record indexes “IMG_3047.PNG,” a social-media screenshot or image stored in the Social Media Archive section “Rumors.” The artifact is preserved for provenance, but searchable source text is withheld because this section may contain private communications, payment activity, anonymous accusations, health-related posts, harassment, or unverified account attribution. The record does not authenticate an account, identify a user behind a handle, or treat statements in the artifact as established facts.