A short Accomplished_Day commentary video arguing that the November 17, 2022 Idaho State Police interview of Jack DuCoeur confirms an answered telephone call between Kaylee Goncalves and DuCoeur at 2:26 a.m. on November 13. The video’s publicly indexed description says the call lasted 16.88 minutes and that investigators had DuCoeur’s phone information during the interview. The underlying interview preserved in Record 004 substantially supports the narrower factual core: at 16:54 an investigator says printouts had been sent ‘from your phone’; at 19:07 he calls the entries incoming to DuCoeur’s phone; at 19:11 he identifies an entry dated November 13 at 2:26 a.m.; and at 19:20–19:26 he describes it as a 16.88-minute answered call. DuCoeur says he does not remember the call, later recalls seeing the entry on his phone, and accepts an accidental-answer explanation only as his best guess. The interview also says no call audio was known to be available. The source therefore supports that investigators were reviewing a printout showing an answered connection, but it does not establish what was said, whether anyone spoke, why the connection remained open, the precise technical origin or completeness of the printout, or the physical locations of either phone. Claims that the clip conclusively proves a 17-minute conversation, establishes motive, or resolves broader timeline disputes go beyond the underlying source. A complete transcript of this commentary video was not available during cataloging; Record 006 must be updated in place if captions or a supplied transcript become available.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “Available_Today__R.pdf,” filed under Pullman Documents › Emails › Police & Other Official Emails. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of Pullman, Washington agency records, correspondence, spreadsheets, and related source documents. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “11.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Families v. WSU. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
The fourth installment compiles WSU safety concerns, institutional communications, media-related correspondence, public-records handling, and investigative support. Visible examples include a parent’s November 22, 2022 questions about campus safety and academic options, a January 2023 message circulating a Kohberger internship-related video, and a January 2024 request concerning memorial coins for WSU Police staff who worked the Idaho Four response. The large production also references parking, LPR, warrant, and administrative records; each thread must be read with its own date and sender context.
The eighth and largest text installment compiles media requests, interview invitations, press releases, campus-safety communications, public-records correspondence, parking/LPR references, warrant-related material, and institutional messaging. Examples include a December 27, 2022 podcast invitation to WSU Police leadership, January 3 Moscow releases on extradition and nondissemination, and WSU communications describing increased patrols, safe-ride and escort resources, academic flexibility, and employee/student support after the homicides and arrest. Repetition and forwarded chains are substantial; each item’s sender, date, attachment, and status should be verified in the original.