A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-5.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-6.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-7.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-8.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-9.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “57.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “58-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
The fourth installment compiles WSU safety concerns, institutional communications, media-related correspondence, public-records handling, and investigative support. Visible examples include a parent’s November 22, 2022 questions about campus safety and academic options, a January 2023 message circulating a Kohberger internship-related video, and a January 2024 request concerning memorial coins for WSU Police staff who worked the Idaho Four response. The large production also references parking, LPR, warrant, and administrative records; each thread must be read with its own date and sender context.
The seventh installment is warrant-focused. It includes Whitman County templates and completed application language for searching Kohberger’s Steptoe Village apartment and WSU office, descriptions of the premises, probable-cause material supplied by Idaho investigators, categories of property sought, supporting declarations, and related warrant/inventory records. Because the extraction can flatten checkboxes, signature blocks, exhibits, and inventories, the signed original pages—not this text layer—control the scope actually authorized and the items recorded as seized.
The eighth and largest text installment compiles media requests, interview invitations, press releases, campus-safety communications, public-records correspondence, parking/LPR references, warrant-related material, and institutional messaging. Examples include a December 27, 2022 podcast invitation to WSU Police leadership, January 3 Moscow releases on extradition and nondissemination, and WSU communications describing increased patrols, safe-ride and escort resources, academic flexibility, and employee/student support after the homicides and arrest. Repetition and forwarded chains are substantial; each item’s sender, date, attachment, and status should be verified in the original.
This record indexes “v12044gd0000cdfg8ibc77u9jrca7e80.MP4,” a video/mp4 file stored under “Maddie Mogen TikTok.” Drive confirms the file identity and size, but no reliable transcript, captions, speaker identification, or complete timestamp map was available through the connected extraction. The record therefore makes no action-level or dialogue-level claims and links to the original media for direct review.
This record indexes “bn_03345.png,” a social-media screenshot or image stored in the Social Media Archive section “Steve G & Brat Norton Messages.” The artifact is preserved for provenance, but searchable source text is withheld because this section may contain private communications, payment activity, anonymous accusations, health-related posts, harassment, or unverified account attribution. The record does not authenticate an account, identify a user behind a handle, or treat statements in the artifact as established facts.
This record indexes “bn_04969.png,” a social-media screenshot or image stored in the Social Media Archive section “Steve G & Brat Norton Messages.” The artifact is preserved for provenance, but searchable source text is withheld because this section may contain private communications, payment activity, anonymous accusations, health-related posts, harassment, or unverified account attribution. The record does not authenticate an account, identify a user behind a handle, or treat statements in the artifact as established facts.
Source file “04___Customer Exit GR 1_Friday January 6 202330227 aa773ab.avi” from Security Camera Footage › Walmart › 11 › 29 › 22. The original file remains in Google Drive. This entry indexes the supplied filename and folder placement; the recording itself has not been reviewed.
Source file “02___POS_45_Friday January 6 202342334 84d8844.avi” from Security Camera Footage › Walmart › 11 › 12 › 22. The original file remains in Google Drive. This entry indexes the supplied filename and folder placement; the recording itself has not been reviewed.
Source file “2023-01-06_17_Original.PNG” from Photos › News Photos . This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The image or file contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “2023-01-03_13_Original.jpg” from Photos › News Photos . This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The image or file contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “2022-11-16_1_Original.jpg” from Photos › News Photos . This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The image or file contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “Axon_Capture_Photo_2022-09-13_171334_481r.jpg” from Photos › Pullman Police › Stephen Hain. This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The image or file contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “Copy of 20220712_193346.jpg” from Photos › BK › Before 11.13.22. This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The image or file contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “3343.pdf” from MPD Press Releases › Documents. This entry preserves the supplied filename, folder placement, and original Drive link. The document or recording contents have not been reviewed.
Source file “Othram Confidentiality Agreements.pdf” from ISP POLICE AND FORENSICS. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “2.11.25 States Respoinse to Defendants 22nd Supp Request for Disc Exhibit U.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.