A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “033125+REDACTED+Exhibits+to+Defs+3rd+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Discovery+RE+Expert+Witnesses+Penalty+Phase.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “033125+States+Motion+to+Seal+States+Response+to+Defendants+Proposed+Jury+Questionnaire.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “033125+States+Response+to+Defendants+Proposed+Jury+Questionnaire.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “070325+Motion+to+be+Heard+as+Interested+Parties+and+Motion+to+Vacate+Nondissemination+Order.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “072325+State+Exhibit+S1-7232025+Sentencing+Hearing.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “5272025_Order_Sealing_Defs_Objection_to_Courts_Rqst_for_Defense_to_Submit_Redacted_Copy_of_Ex_Parte_Filing.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Idaho Court Docs › 2025. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “24-2.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “45.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “46.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “47.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “48-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “48-2.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “48-3.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “48.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “49.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “5.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “50-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “56-14.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “63-7.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
The second installment compiles WSU-received communications and records surrounding the Idaho Four investigation. It opens with January 3, 2023 Moscow releases concerning Kohberger’s extradition, the Idaho court process, and the nondissemination order, then continues with agency correspondence, WSU scheduling and patrol information, Steptoe-related records, public-records handling, and investigative support material. Public releases, internal emails, schedules, and law-enforcement records are different evidence types and are indexed as such rather than treated as one continuous narrative.
The third installment centers on interagency and WSU correspondence. It includes the November 28, 2022 law-enforcement-sensitive vehicle BOLO forwarded by Moscow Police; later messages about Kohberger’s WSU criminal-justice fellowship interview materials; and May 2023 requests for extra patrols around graduate-student housing during renewed media attention and the then-scheduled preliminary hearing. It also contains additional WSU, Pullman Police, Moscow Police, public-information, and administrative records.
The fourth installment compiles WSU safety concerns, institutional communications, media-related correspondence, public-records handling, and investigative support. Visible examples include a parent’s November 22, 2022 questions about campus safety and academic options, a January 2023 message circulating a Kohberger internship-related video, and a January 2024 request concerning memorial coins for WSU Police staff who worked the Idaho Four response. The large production also references parking, LPR, warrant, and administrative records; each thread must be read with its own date and sender context.
The fifth installment continues WSU safety and investigative-coordination records. It includes WSU’s response to community safety concerns, discussion of increased patrols and critical-incident coordination, correspondence about providing campus video to Moscow Police, prosecutor and Washington Attorney General communications concerning WSU records warrants, and other investigative or administrative follow-up extending beyond the immediate arrest period.
The seventh installment is warrant-focused. It includes Whitman County templates and completed application language for searching Kohberger’s Steptoe Village apartment and WSU office, descriptions of the premises, probable-cause material supplied by Idaho investigators, categories of property sought, supporting declarations, and related warrant/inventory records. Because the extraction can flatten checkboxes, signature blocks, exhibits, and inventories, the signed original pages—not this text layer—control the scope actually authorized and the items recorded as seized.