An email request seeking correspondence—not application paperwork—about the SFY2023 Moscow Police Department grant extension and $9,973.95 allocation. The requester's identifying information is redacted. It defines the intended scope of the production indexed in Record 035.
Othram shipping instructions plus duplicate shipment-receipt and chain-of-custody forms for submission/request 21128. The forms record one hand-delivered item from Dustin Blaker, received November 22, 2022 at 3:15 p.m., with no package damage checked. Visible case-ID and item-notes fields are blank, so the packet does not itself identify the evidence item or establish a connection to the knife sheath or another named exhibit.
Signed calculation form requesting $1,833.48 for 27 overtime hours of party patrols by Jacob Tesdahl, Aaron Morris, Jon Rosinsky and Joseph Sieverding on April 28 and May 5–6, 2023. It itemizes hourly rates, 24% benefits and totals, and was certified by Eric Warner July 31.
Email chain in which Alisa Anderson says an earlier PDF was wrong or blank and resends the correct signed grant extension. The quoted chain documents ODP's fifth-quarter offer, Eric Warner's proposed extra plain-clothing party patrols through September 25, and Anderson's execution of the agreement.
Email chain around invoice FY2021000161. The embedded July 31 request seeks $1,833.48 for 27 party-patrol man-hours on the University of Idaho campus from April through June. On August 1, Sharlene Johnson says about $7,700 remains; on August 4, Eric Warner asks whether those funds remain available and whether an extension is coming.
A distinct export of the same reimbursement thread that adds Sharlene Johnson's August 4 reply: an extension agreement would go out, the current round had ended, and ODP had applied for another five years including law-enforcement grants. It repeats the $1,833.48 request and approximate $7,700 remaining-balance discussion.
A redacted retail receipt timestamped 10:34:17 p.m. on November 12, 2022. It lists two Bounty napkin items, one GF ham bun, two shredded mozzarella items and one abbreviated “CHRM 30MR” item, totaling $56.92 including $3.16 tax, paid by debit. The visible receipt does not identify the store, purchaser, city, or connection to any person in the case.
Invoice FY2021000176 requests $291.30 for four overtime hours worked by Jacob Tesdahl on a University of Idaho party patrol from 10:15 p.m. September 1 to 2:15 a.m. September 2, 2023. Eric Warner's submission says officers did not sign up for 23 other available four-hour patrols. The packet shows submission/certification, not final approval or payment.
Twelve-page grant package proposing University of Idaho plain-clothes party patrols and Highway 95 drug-interdiction patrols using K9 Ragnar. The personnel budget allocates $4,921.80 to interdiction and $5,052.15 to party patrols, total $9,973.95, with no other cost categories. It includes a June 17, 2022 award letter and the August 2023 extension acknowledgment. Planned/budgeted operations are not proof that each activity occurred.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
A four-page Moscow Police evidence/property receipt documenting items collected at the 1122 King Road scene. Legible entries include fingerprint lifts, swabs, electronic devices, a knife sheath, clothing, and other items tied to specific rooms or exhibit numbers. Handwriting and redactions make some entries uncertain, so the original page images control over OCR.
A released image exhibit with identifying content covered by statutory privacy redactions. The accompanying redaction log identifies the exemption applied; the visible release does not support identification of the people or underlying subject matter.
A timestamped transcript of the emergency call received at 11:55:42 a.m. on November 13, 2022. It documents the callers reporting that something had happened inside the house, efforts to confirm the address and condition of a roommate, and dispatch instructions before first responders arrived. Personal telephone information is omitted from the searchable text on this site.
Screenshots of text messages concerning scene security, a search warrant, evidence-photo storage under CJIS policy, documentation of window-lock positions, laboratory processing, cleanup of stained drywall, and obtaining elimination fingerprints from the two surviving roommates. The export contains gaps and does not establish the complete conversation chronology.
A short, partially redacted phone-message export attributed to Detective Dustin Blaker’s communications with the surviving roommates. A visible message references an October 15 fight and identifies several participants only by initials. Because the capture is fragmentary, it should not be treated as a complete interview or complete message thread.
A screenshot presenting cached images or URLs associated with searches about historical serial offenders. The screenshot is an extracted or compiled view, not the underlying forensic database; device ownership, timestamps, search context, and attribution require confirmation from the native forensic return.