ODP response to request ODP-PRR-005 concerning SFY2023 Partnership for Success application paperwork for Moscow PD party patrols/interdiction. It provides a redacted transfer link and explains a 180-day appeal period. The linked package is not authenticated by the letter alone.
Invoice FY2021000176 requests $291.30 for four overtime hours worked by Jacob Tesdahl on a University of Idaho party patrol from 10:15 p.m. September 1 to 2:15 a.m. September 2, 2023. Eric Warner's submission says officers did not sign up for 23 other available four-hour patrols. The packet shows submission/certification, not final approval or payment.
Twelve-page grant package proposing University of Idaho plain-clothes party patrols and Highway 95 drug-interdiction patrols using K9 Ragnar. The personnel budget allocates $4,921.80 to interdiction and $5,052.15 to party patrols, total $9,973.95, with no other cost categories. It includes a June 17, 2022 award letter and the August 2023 extension acknowledgment. Planned/budgeted operations are not proof that each activity occurred.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
A user-compiled chronology of alleged phone, Wi-Fi, call, download, and browser activity attributed to Bryan Kohberger in November and December 2022. It includes interpretive statements about device behavior and a Mad Greek cache file. The document does not itself provide the underlying forensic extraction or validation report, so its claims remain unverified until matched to primary exhibits.
Handwritten notes attributed to Officer Mitch Nunes from the initial response and scene. Legible portions reference the surviving roommates, sleeping locations, the 1122 King Road address, and early observations. OCR of the handwriting is unreliable; factual use should rely on a manual reading of the original pages and comparison with the incident report and body-camera files.
An email thread discussing terminology and observations concerning the knife sheath, including the relationship between its leather strap and metal snap. The exchange is useful for interpreting related sheath photographs but should be read with the native lab notes and evidence log.
A police incident record titled “16C31883_ ACCIDENT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C05623_ ACCIDENT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C27768_ TRAFF HAZ-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C47415_ SHOTS FIRED-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “19C48812_ THEFT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2022, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2023, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2024, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.
The Moscow Police Department annual report for 2024, containing agency activity, staffing, programs, calls, enforcement data, and other published metrics for the year. It provides institutional context; aggregate statistics do not establish facts about an individual incident.