A BronxTails True Crime community post shares an image of a response to a request for ISP Lab Report 42. The displayed correspondence says there are no responsive records and that the laboratory did not generate or issue a report numbered 42. The creator expresses skepticism. This entry preserves the source and distinguishes the displayed response from the creator’s interpretation; it does not establish concealment or the existence of an undisclosed report.
A BronxTails True Crime community post discusses a records return identified as MPD Report 170 and a separate request concerning Report 202. The creator contrasts the release of material about kitchen knives with a reported delay for another knife-related request. The displayed attachment is a redacted supplemental narrative labeled sequence 170 concerning knives near Genesee. The post’s comparisons and interpretations are commentary, not findings about the knives or the reasons for the response times.
A BronxTails True Crime community post reports an approximately two-hour Mason Barstow interview and a quoted records cost of $311. The creator also reports denial of a Connor Chestnut FBI interview request and states that no Mason Bangeman interview was conducted. The displayed first attachment is correspondence about processing a Barstow interview request, showing an estimated $311.67 cost and approximately 106 minutes of video. These are attributed source statements; the archive has not independently established interview availability or reviewed the full correspondence sequence.
Source file “Copy of requests-2026-08-04.xlsx” from Copy of requests-2026-08-04.xlsx. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “MORE Service Requests to Separate later.pdf” from ISP POLICE AND FORENSICS. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “Lab Service Request 4843 and 4870 (will separate at a later date).pdf” from ISP POLICE AND FORENSICS. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “3.31.25 Psych Experts REDACTED Exhibits to Defs 3rd Supp Resp to Request for Discovery RE Expert Witnesses Penalty Phase.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “1.23.25 REDACTED Exhibits to Defendants Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Re Expert Index.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “2.11.25 States Respoinse to Defendants 22nd Supp Request for Disc Exhibit U.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “4.2.26 States Request for Decision without a Hearing.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “07.09.25 Motion to Seal Exhibit S-1 to States Response to Defendants 24th Supplemental Request.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “07.09.25 States Response to Request for Discovery.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “07.14.25 Order Denying Requests to Video Record Sentencing Proceedings and Approving Pool Still Photographer.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “07.14.25 Order Sealing Exhibit S-1 to States Response to Defendants 24th Supplemental Request for Discovery.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “08.26.25 Order Regarding Requested Redactions.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “9.22.25 Order Sealing States Exhibit 1 Re States Request for Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “9.22.25 States Request for Restitution and Motion to Seal Exhibit 1.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “10.07.25 Defendants Objection to States Request for Additional Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “10.24.25 States Response to Defendants Objection to Request for Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “11.4.25 Motion to Seal Notice of Filing Declaration ISO Defendants Objection to States Request for Additional Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “11.6.25 Order Sealing Notice Defendants Objection to States Request for Additional Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “11.13.25 Order on States Request for Restitution.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “12.18.25 States Request for Decision Without Hearing.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.
Source file “37-States Response to Defendants First Supplemental Request for Discovery 2.21.23.pdf” from ALL COURT RECORDS ON CASE OF INTEREST SITE. This entry preserves its original Drive link and collection placement. Contents have not been reviewed; titles and folder labels are source descriptions, not independent findings.