A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “89.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “9.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “91.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “92-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “92-2.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “92.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “93-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “93.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “94-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “94.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “95-1.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “95-2.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “95-3.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “95.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “96.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “97.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “98.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive PDF titled “99.pdf,” filed under Court Docs › Scofield v. Guillard. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of court filings and related litigation records organized by jurisdiction or proceeding. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
The first WSU production installment begins with WSU Police incident 22-W4386 and materials concerning assistance to Moscow Police after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest. It documents warrant preparation and service for apartment G201 at Steptoe Village and an office in Wilson-Short Hall, scene security, personnel involved, property/evidence handling, related reports, later administrative processing, and supporting communications. The extraction also contains BOLO, vehicle, public-records, FERPA/redaction, and follow-up material; individual pages must be consulted before attributing a statement or evidence item to a particular author.
The second installment compiles WSU-received communications and records surrounding the Idaho Four investigation. It opens with January 3, 2023 Moscow releases concerning Kohberger’s extradition, the Idaho court process, and the nondissemination order, then continues with agency correspondence, WSU scheduling and patrol information, Steptoe-related records, public-records handling, and investigative support material. Public releases, internal emails, schedules, and law-enforcement records are different evidence types and are indexed as such rather than treated as one continuous narrative.
The third installment centers on interagency and WSU correspondence. It includes the November 28, 2022 law-enforcement-sensitive vehicle BOLO forwarded by Moscow Police; later messages about Kohberger’s WSU criminal-justice fellowship interview materials; and May 2023 requests for extra patrols around graduate-student housing during renewed media attention and the then-scheduled preliminary hearing. It also contains additional WSU, Pullman Police, Moscow Police, public-information, and administrative records.
The fourth installment compiles WSU safety concerns, institutional communications, media-related correspondence, public-records handling, and investigative support. Visible examples include a parent’s November 22, 2022 questions about campus safety and academic options, a January 2023 message circulating a Kohberger internship-related video, and a January 2024 request concerning memorial coins for WSU Police staff who worked the Idaho Four response. The large production also references parking, LPR, warrant, and administrative records; each thread must be read with its own date and sender context.
The fifth installment continues WSU safety and investigative-coordination records. It includes WSU’s response to community safety concerns, discussion of increased patrols and critical-incident coordination, correspondence about providing campus video to Moscow Police, prosecutor and Washington Attorney General communications concerning WSU records warrants, and other investigative or administrative follow-up extending beyond the immediate arrest period.
The sixth installment contains arrest announcements, agency-response records, warrant and evidence references, vehicle-identification communications, staff messages, and related WSU materials. It opens with the December 30, 2022 Moscow Police arrest release and includes later WSU discussion of how officers located a possible suspect vehicle near Kohberger’s residence. One January 5 message says the public affidavit’s vehicle-discovery timeline was not entirely correct and gives an alternate internal chronology: the BOLO email on November 28, a plate query early November 29, and an observation at the apartment complex shortly afterward. That statement is preserved as the author’s account and should be compared with dispatch, database, and sworn-record timestamps.