Search all record metadata, summaries, people, places, dates, tags, evidence references, reliability notes, and transcripts.
An Idaho State Police interview with Cole Barenberg, a University of Idaho student who knew Madison Mogen through a class project. Barenberg describes seeing Madison and Kaylee Goncalves at the Corner Club on the night of November 12–13, a group photo and message sent at 11:21 p.m., his movements afterward, how he learned of the homicides, and the voluntary DNA swab taken at the close of the interview.
An in-person Idaho State Police interview of Jack DuCoeur, Kaylee Goncalves’s former boyfriend, recorded at 10:03 a.m. on November 17, 2022. Detective Sergeant Mike Van Leuven and Detective Rich Alderson question DuCoeur about his relationship with Kaylee; his work, bar, ride, and sleep timeline on November 12–13; repeated calls and texts from Kaylee and Madison Mogen; his knowledge of Ethan Chapin and Xana Kernodle; access to 1122 King Road; knives; the house’s door code and locks; the victims’ social circle; and an unidentified rideshare driver. DuCoeur says he left the Corner Club at about 1:00 a.m., reached home shortly afterward, and was asleep around 1:20 a.m. Phone records shown during the interview reportedly include a 2:26 a.m. call from Kaylee that lasted 16.88 minutes; DuCoeur says he does not remember answering or speaking with her and suggests the connection may have been accidental. He also describes the next morning, when he saw police activity near 1122 King Road, approached the scene, and was later placed in a patrol car after identifying himself as Kaylee’s former boyfriend. The interview includes discussion of Grub Truck footage, a neighbor’s doorbell video, a black Baton vape, phone-log and text printouts, a sketch of the house, and the property’s keypad code. This record summarizes what the participants said and what the transcript reports they viewed; it does not independently establish the truth of every statement or the authenticity and completeness of each referenced exhibit.
This released segment resumes the November 17, 2022 interview of Jack DuCoeur at approximately 11:36 a.m. and continues the interview preserved in Record 004. The interviewers return to a neighboring home-security camera and screenshots that DuCoeur says show a vehicle arriving near 1122 King Road at approximately 1:56 a.m. and leaving roughly 50 seconds later. DuCoeur repeatedly qualifies that he cannot be certain the vehicle belongs to the rideshare driver, and says Moscow police were told where to obtain the video. Investigators then ask about access to the house, how widely the keypad code may have circulated, whether the exterior doors were normally locked, and whether the code may have remained unchanged from the prior year. The discussion expands to Madison Mogen’s background, relationships, former roommates, and people connected to Madison and Kaylee Goncalves. DuCoeur describes an anonymous Instagram account that allegedly asked whether he was still dating Kaylee and later offered to pay for intimate images. He also recounts hearing that Madison had received a possibly similar message and that Madison’s boyfriend received a Twitter message saying people were ‘coming for’ him. Those allegations are witness reports and are not authenticated by this transcript. Later, DuCoeur describes summer living arrangements at 1122 King Road, messages Kaylee allegedly received from another man, prior residents, and Kaylee’s move from the second-floor bedroom later occupied by Xana Kernodle to a third-floor bedroom about two months earlier. The segment closes at approximately 12:15 p.m. when an interviewer stops for another break. The transcript contains extensive digital redactions, unresolved speaker boundaries, and uncertain names; it documents investigative questions and witness recollection, not proven findings.
A three-page Ada County Sheriff computer-aided dispatch incident detail report for incident 25-0245748 and case ACS25-006518. The CAD entry says a Goncalves family attorney emailed Deputy James C. Revello concerning a threatening text sent to Kristi Goncalves after the Kohberger sentencing. According to the report narrative, the text was received on July 23, 2025 at 10:42 a.m. and claimed that the sender was in contact with a ‘wannabe serial killer’ in Moscow, Idaho and had provided that person with Kristi’s address. The originating phone number and part of the attorney identification are visibly redacted. The report says carrierlookup.com identified the number as a VoIP number through SINCH and that a second, redacted database search returned negative results. Revello created a low-priority THREAT-Threat Report at the Ada County Courthouse at 1:38:07 p.m. on July 24, obtained case number ACS25-006518 ten seconds later, and closed the response at 2:05:40 p.m. with the disposition ‘RPT-Report Taken.’ The CAD contains no attached copy of the text message, no sender identification, no underlying carrier record, and no documented independent confirmation that the sender actually knew another person or possessed Kristi Goncalves’s address. The archive preserves the original PDF, a checked editorial transcription, the visible redactions, and the distinction between what the CAD records and what remains unverified.
A 13-page Ada County Sheriff report, DR 2025-6518, documenting a threatening-text complaint made by Kristi Goncalves during Bryan Kohberger's July 23, 2025 sentencing. Deputy James Revello records that an unknown sender claimed to be near Goncalves in court, asserted Kohberger's innocence, referenced serial killers, and claimed to have supplied her address to a person in Moscow. The report traces investigative steps through carrier lookup, a TextMe preservation request and warrant, a Google warrant, account/device/billing observations, and IP-location analysis. It ultimately identifies Southeast England—particularly Kent—as the likely persistent service area and closes the case as “Other Jurisdiction.” Names, telephone numbers, emails, account IDs, IP addresses, and payment details are redacted. The sender's statements and the report's identity/location conclusions remain allegations and investigative inferences, not adjudicated facts.
A seven-page certified Idaho Department of Correction daily transaction summary for offender 0163214, Bryan Christopher Kohberger, covering one year beginning with a zero balance and ending at $177.03. The statement prints total deposits of $10,812.13 and expenses of $10,635.10. It lists deposits from named third parties and Ada County, recurring commissary purchases, medical payables, kiosk transfers, administrative fees, phone credits, and postage. It identifies institution IM, living/housing unit J, cell 55, tier 2, and bed A. Certification stamps overlap portions of several rows, and voucher prefixes are blacked out; obscured cells are not reconstructed.
An eight-page handwritten petition in civil case CV01-26-15094 seeking withdrawal of Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea. It references criminal case CR01-24-31665, a July 23, 2025 sentence, four capital-murder counts and felony burglary, and life without parole plus ten years. The petition alleges ineffective assistance, an unknowing or involuntary plea, unkept promises, threats by counsel, failure to disclose or review claimed exculpatory material, and misrepresentations concerning death row and prison conditions. A supporting affidavit expands those allegations. Kohberger requests in-forma-pauperis status and appointed counsel. These are a petitioner's disputed allegations; the PDF contains no response, evidentiary ruling, or decision. Page 8 is a scanned legal-mail envelope.
A Moscow Police Department custody report for incident 22-M09903 and evidence number 22M-1839, described as “Item 40 Blood Swab” from the “F3 South closet wall.” It records booking at 9:34:47 a.m. on November 14, 2022 and receipt/booking at 4:59:25 p.m. on November 15, both associated with Brett Payne and the reason “Send to Lab.” It records legal-defense viewing by Jeff Talbott on April 7, 2023 for photography. The report does not state the swab’s biological profile, test result, source individual, collection method, packaging condition, lab accession number, or whether “blood” was analytically confirmed.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
A four-page Moscow Police evidence/property receipt documenting items collected at the 1122 King Road scene. Legible entries include fingerprint lifts, swabs, electronic devices, a knife sheath, clothing, and other items tied to specific rooms or exhibit numbers. Handwriting and redactions make some entries uncertain, so the original page images control over OCR.
An email thread discussing terminology and observations concerning the knife sheath, including the relationship between its leather strap and metal snap. The exchange is useful for interpreting related sheath photographs but should be read with the native lab notes and evidence log.
This source photograph shows a close view of a small feature or mark on a dark textured surface beside an evidence scale. It is preserved as a discrete image because its angle, examiner marks, and evidence-card information may differ from adjacent photographs in the same series. The image documents visible condition only; item identity, collection location, date, ownership, and custody must be verified through the corresponding photo log and evidence report.
This source photograph shows a close view of a small feature or mark on a dark textured surface beside an evidence scale. It is preserved as a discrete image because its angle, examiner marks, and evidence-card information may differ from adjacent photographs in the same series. The image documents visible condition only; item identity, collection location, date, ownership, and custody must be verified through the corresponding photo log and evidence report.
This source photograph shows a close view of a small feature or mark on a dark textured surface beside an evidence scale. It is preserved as a discrete image because its angle, examiner marks, and evidence-card information may differ from adjacent photographs in the same series. The image documents visible condition only; item identity, collection location, date, ownership, and custody must be verified through the corresponding photo log and evidence report.
A police incident record titled “16C31883_ ACCIDENT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “17C11249_ FOUND PROP-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C05623_ ACCIDENT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C27768_ TRAFF HAZ-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “18C47415_ SHOTS FIRED-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
A police incident record titled “19C48812_ THEFT-Redacted.” It is indexed as a discrete background source with its original redactions. The report documents the agency’s recorded complaint, response, observations, and disposition for that event; it should not be treated as evidence of the Idaho Four homicides unless a specific, corroborated connection is established.
Showing 1–24 of 99 records