This released segment resumes the November 17, 2022 interview of Jack DuCoeur at approximately 11:36 a.m. and continues the interview preserved in Record 004. The interviewers return to a neighboring home-security camera and screenshots that DuCoeur says show a vehicle arriving near 1122 King Road at approximately 1:56 a.m. and leaving roughly 50 seconds later. DuCoeur repeatedly qualifies that he cannot be certain the vehicle belongs to the rideshare driver, and says Moscow police were told where to obtain the video. Investigators then ask about access to the house, how widely the keypad code may have circulated, whether the exterior doors were normally locked, and whether the code may have remained unchanged from the prior year. The discussion expands to Madison Mogen’s background, relationships, former roommates, and people connected to Madison and Kaylee Goncalves. DuCoeur describes an anonymous Instagram account that allegedly asked whether he was still dating Kaylee and later offered to pay for intimate images. He also recounts hearing that Madison had received a possibly similar message and that Madison’s boyfriend received a Twitter message saying people were ‘coming for’ him. Those allegations are witness reports and are not authenticated by this transcript. Later, DuCoeur describes summer living arrangements at 1122 King Road, messages Kaylee allegedly received from another man, prior residents, and Kaylee’s move from the second-floor bedroom later occupied by Xana Kernodle to a third-floor bedroom about two months earlier. The segment closes at approximately 12:15 p.m. when an interviewer stops for another break. The transcript contains extensive digital redactions, unresolved speaker boundaries, and uncertain names; it documents investigative questions and witness recollection, not proven findings.
A later three-page export for the same MPD evidence number 22M-1810 / Item 11 K-BAR knife sheath documented in Record 017. It lists custody events from November 2022 through July 2025, including laboratory-related transfers and later review/location changes. This is a separate report export, not a second sheath or newly collected evidence item.
A three-sheet workbook identifying an Amazon account as Bryan C Kohberger and presenting subscription information, 289 click-activity rows, and 57 sign-in-history rows. Click activity clusters on March 20–26, November 15 and 22, and December 6, 2022, including KA-BAR knife, sheath and sharpener product pages plus account/order and deletion-flow pages. Click paths document account/session activity, not who used a device, completed purchases, delivery, possession, or physical location.
Othram shipping instructions plus duplicate shipment-receipt and chain-of-custody forms for submission/request 21128. The forms record one hand-delivered item from Dustin Blaker, received November 22, 2022 at 3:15 p.m., with no package damage checked. Visible case-ID and item-notes fields are blank, so the packet does not itself identify the evidence item or establish a connection to the knife sheath or another named exhibit.
A redacted retail receipt timestamped 10:34:17 p.m. on November 12, 2022. It lists two Bounty napkin items, one GF ham bun, two shredded mozzarella items and one abbreviated “CHRM 30MR” item, totaling $56.92 including $3.16 tax, paid by debit. The visible receipt does not identify the store, purchaser, city, or connection to any person in the case.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of two photographs documenting delivery or packaging associated with DNA material sent to Othram. The image supports visual review of the parcel or receipt but should be correlated with the signed chain-of-custody paperwork and laboratory accession records.
One of two photographs documenting delivery or packaging associated with DNA material sent to Othram. The image supports visual review of the parcel or receipt but should be correlated with the signed chain-of-custody paperwork and laboratory accession records.
A 2,356-page Idaho State Police Forensic Services production centered on laboratory case M2022-4843 for Moscow Police case 22-M09903, with related ISP Investigations laboratory case M2022-4870 / D22000030 material. The release contains case jackets, submission and item inventories, chain-of-custody and location records, biology and DNA worksheets, STRmix output, CODIS-related documentation, latent-print processing and comparison reports, analyst notes, technical and administrative reviews, correspondence, discovery-packet histories, audit entries, and supporting forms. It records numerous submissions from November 2022 through June 2025 and references suspected biological stains, reference samples, DNA extracts, latent lifts, clothing and other evidence. Individual report language and statistical conclusions must be read in context; this archive record indexes the production and its searchable extraction rather than collapsing thousands of pages into a single forensic conclusion.
A large collection of Idaho State Police investigative supplements for case D22000030. The searchable extraction includes the November 13, 2022 initial call-out, witness and roommate interviews, crime-scene work on multiple dates, photographic and SUAS documentation, evidence transport, phone and video inquiries, search-warrant activity, receipts, hospital checks, WSU and Moscow reports, vehicle and Hyundai Elantra processing, defense evidence processing, and later witness-list follow-up. At least 117 unique supplement identifiers and 35 report-title labels are visible in the extraction, with reports attributed to numerous ISP investigators. The collection records officer narratives, witness recollections, investigative leads and later follow-up; those categories are not interchangeable with independently proven fact.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0467.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0468.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0469.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0470.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0471.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0475.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0477.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0481.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.
A verified connected-Drive photograph titled “IMG_0482.JPG,” filed under Crime Scene Photos. The authorized folder context identifies it as part of crime-scene and evidence photography. This record preserves the original source link, filename, folder placement, media type, byte size, and Drive dates. Content-level facts are not inferred from the filename alone; exact quotations, image interpretation, named participants, event dates, exhibit identifiers, and conclusions require review of the linked original.