An in-person Idaho State Police interview of Jack DuCoeur, Kaylee Goncalves’s former boyfriend, recorded at 10:03 a.m. on November 17, 2022. Detective Sergeant Mike Van Leuven and Detective Rich Alderson question DuCoeur about his relationship with Kaylee; his work, bar, ride, and sleep timeline on November 12–13; repeated calls and texts from Kaylee and Madison Mogen; his knowledge of Ethan Chapin and Xana Kernodle; access to 1122 King Road; knives; the house’s door code and locks; the victims’ social circle; and an unidentified rideshare driver. DuCoeur says he left the Corner Club at about 1:00 a.m., reached home shortly afterward, and was asleep around 1:20 a.m. Phone records shown during the interview reportedly include a 2:26 a.m. call from Kaylee that lasted 16.88 minutes; DuCoeur says he does not remember answering or speaking with her and suggests the connection may have been accidental. He also describes the next morning, when he saw police activity near 1122 King Road, approached the scene, and was later placed in a patrol car after identifying himself as Kaylee’s former boyfriend. The interview includes discussion of Grub Truck footage, a neighbor’s doorbell video, a black Baton vape, phone-log and text printouts, a sketch of the house, and the property’s keypad code. This record summarizes what the participants said and what the transcript reports they viewed; it does not independently establish the truth of every statement or the authenticity and completeness of each referenced exhibit.
A two-page email chain concerning the Moscow Police Department’s SFY2023 Partnerships for Success grant extension. On August 8, 2023, Idaho Office of Drug Policy administrator Sharlene Johnson notified Officer Eric Warner that the extension letter was available. On August 9, Warner told City of Moscow staff that the grant had been extended for a fifth quarter and said he hoped to use the additional period for extra plain-clothing party patrols, which he characterized as reducing campus intoxication calls and deterring underage drinking. Later that day, grants manager Alisa Anderson sent Johnson an executed extension agreement. The chain documents administrative communications and Warner’s stated program rationale; it does not contain patrol reports, outcome data, reimbursement records, or a direct connection to the homicide investigation.
An Idaho Office of Drug Policy notice approving Moscow Police Department’s application for a fifth-quarter extension to deliver substance-abuse prevention services. The notice is dated August 8, 2023, effective July 1, 2023, and leaves the July 1, 2022 original grant terms in force. It states that the extension and final-invoice deadline are September 25, 2023; changes to the action plan require advance ODP approval; and a signed acknowledgment is due within 10 days. The second page states funding covers July through September 2023, requires a fifth-quarter report by October 15, 2023, and lists total original-plus-fifth-quarter allocation of $9,973.95. The acknowledgment fields in this copy are blank.
A three-sheet workbook identifying an Amazon account as Bryan C Kohberger and presenting subscription information, 289 click-activity rows, and 57 sign-in-history rows. Click activity clusters on March 20–26, November 15 and 22, and December 6, 2022, including KA-BAR knife, sheath and sharpener product pages plus account/order and deletion-flow pages. Click paths document account/session activity, not who used a device, completed purchases, delivery, possession, or physical location.
ODP response to request ODP-PRR-005 concerning SFY2023 Partnership for Success application paperwork for Moscow PD party patrols/interdiction. It provides a redacted transfer link and explains a 180-day appeal period. The linked package is not authenticated by the letter alone.
Printout of a Serv-U transfer page for ODP-PRR-006 listing eight files related to the SFY2023 Moscow PD extension and reimbursement. The page says the transfer expires August 20, 2026 at 11 p.m., while the subject line says August 21. It is a production index, not proof of each file's contents.
An email request seeking correspondence—not application paperwork—about the SFY2023 Moscow Police Department grant extension and $9,973.95 allocation. The requester's identifying information is redacted. It defines the intended scope of the production indexed in Record 035.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of three preserved exports of a December 2, 2022 email exchange about sending a digital copy of the signed receipt documenting release of the knife sheath to an officer. The export records the request, approval, and acknowledgment; it should be read with the other two exports because each captures a different mailbox view of the same exchange.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
A four-page Moscow Police evidence/property receipt documenting items collected at the 1122 King Road scene. Legible entries include fingerprint lifts, swabs, electronic devices, a knife sheath, clothing, and other items tied to specific rooms or exhibit numbers. Handwriting and redactions make some entries uncertain, so the original page images control over OCR.
One of two comparison photographs showing a leather strap or snap component used to evaluate terminology and construction relevant to the sheath materials. The photograph is contextual, not proof that the pictured comparison item is the recovered crime-scene sheath.
One of two comparison photographs showing a leather strap or snap component used to evaluate terminology and construction relevant to the sheath materials. The photograph is contextual, not proof that the pictured comparison item is the recovered crime-scene sheath.
Photograph 1 in a ten-image series showing multiple views and details of a tan leather knife sheath. The image documents visible condition and construction only; item identity, scale, collection context, and custody must be established through the associated evidence logs and metadata.
Photograph 2 in a ten-image series showing multiple views and details of a tan leather knife sheath. The image documents visible condition and construction only; item identity, scale, collection context, and custody must be established through the associated evidence logs and metadata.
Photograph 3 in a ten-image series showing multiple views and details of a tan leather knife sheath. The image documents visible condition and construction only; item identity, scale, collection context, and custody must be established through the associated evidence logs and metadata.
Photograph 4 in a ten-image series showing multiple views and details of a tan leather knife sheath. The image documents visible condition and construction only; item identity, scale, collection context, and custody must be established through the associated evidence logs and metadata.
Photograph 5 in a ten-image series showing multiple views and details of a tan leather knife sheath. The image documents visible condition and construction only; item identity, scale, collection context, and custody must be established through the associated evidence logs and metadata.