Three-page redacted ISP Supplemental Report 0115, titled “IV – TIP 6008,” by Detective Matthew Heinle. The report describes December 5, 2022 follow-up by Heinle and Detective William Adams concerning an online photograph and a reported knife. It records interviewees’ accounts, a consented buccal swab, and photographs of knives. These are recorded investigative steps and witness statements; the report does not establish a connection between the photographed knives and the homicides.
A Moscow Police Department custody report for incident 22-M09903 and evidence number 22M-2094, described as “Item 258 Swab,” brand “DNA Swab,” owner number 428834. The comment says the swab came from a redacted person or source, was collected by ISP Detective Hoxie, and was submitted directly to the ISP laboratory. The log records booking by Dustin Blaker at 1:19:04 p.m. on November 23, 2022 and receipt/booking on November 25 with the reason “Driven back from Lab by 108.” It does not identify the swab subject, explain radio/identifier 108, report a DNA result, or include the laboratory chain before MPD booking.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
One of six preserved mailbox exports of a May 9, 2023 exchange identifying the knife-sheath swabs and extracts. The exchange states that Lab Item 22 was a portion of the extract from swab 1.1, that Item 22 went to Othram, and that no material had been received back at the time of the email. It also records that whether any extract remained had to be confirmed with Othram.
An email thread discussing terminology and observations concerning the knife sheath, including the relationship between its leather strap and metal snap. The exchange is useful for interpreting related sheath photographs but should be read with the native lab notes and evidence log.
A 2,356-page Idaho State Police Forensic Services production centered on laboratory case M2022-4843 for Moscow Police case 22-M09903, with related ISP Investigations laboratory case M2022-4870 / D22000030 material. The release contains case jackets, submission and item inventories, chain-of-custody and location records, biology and DNA worksheets, STRmix output, CODIS-related documentation, latent-print processing and comparison reports, analyst notes, technical and administrative reviews, correspondence, discovery-packet histories, audit entries, and supporting forms. It records numerous submissions from November 2022 through June 2025 and references suspected biological stains, reference samples, DNA extracts, latent lifts, clothing and other evidence. Individual report language and statistical conclusions must be read in context; this archive record indexes the production and its searchable extraction rather than collapsing thousands of pages into a single forensic conclusion.
A large collection of Idaho State Police investigative supplements for case D22000030. The searchable extraction includes the November 13, 2022 initial call-out, witness and roommate interviews, crime-scene work on multiple dates, photographic and SUAS documentation, evidence transport, phone and video inquiries, search-warrant activity, receipts, hospital checks, WSU and Moscow reports, vehicle and Hyundai Elantra processing, defense evidence processing, and later witness-list follow-up. At least 117 unique supplement identifiers and 35 report-title labels are visible in the extraction, with reports attributed to numerous ISP investigators. The collection records officer narratives, witness recollections, investigative leads and later follow-up; those categories are not interchangeable with independently proven fact.
The third installment centers on interagency and WSU correspondence. It includes the November 28, 2022 law-enforcement-sensitive vehicle BOLO forwarded by Moscow Police; later messages about Kohberger’s WSU criminal-justice fellowship interview materials; and May 2023 requests for extra patrols around graduate-student housing during renewed media attention and the then-scheduled preliminary hearing. It also contains additional WSU, Pullman Police, Moscow Police, public-information, and administrative records.
The sixth installment contains arrest announcements, agency-response records, warrant and evidence references, vehicle-identification communications, staff messages, and related WSU materials. It opens with the December 30, 2022 Moscow Police arrest release and includes later WSU discussion of how officers located a possible suspect vehicle near Kohberger’s residence. One January 5 message says the public affidavit’s vehicle-discovery timeline was not entirely correct and gives an alternate internal chronology: the BOLO email on November 28, a plate query early November 29, and an observation at the apartment complex shortly afterward. That statement is preserved as the author’s account and should be compared with dispatch, database, and sworn-record timestamps.
The eighth and largest text installment compiles media requests, interview invitations, press releases, campus-safety communications, public-records correspondence, parking/LPR references, warrant-related material, and institutional messaging. Examples include a December 27, 2022 podcast invitation to WSU Police leadership, January 3 Moscow releases on extradition and nondissemination, and WSU communications describing increased patrols, safe-ride and escort resources, academic flexibility, and employee/student support after the homicides and arrest. Repetition and forwarded chains are substantial; each item’s sender, date, attachment, and status should be verified in the original.